← Back to blog
Thinking·Aug 27, 2026·4 min read

My game plan for Study Brew: I almost blew it

In March this year, I started with a concept and a dry run: recording bedtime stories for English learners at a B1 to B2 level. I wasn't thinking much of it yet. I'd already tried, more than once, to vibe code a language learning app, and every attempt failed.

Then, using Claude Code and a workflow that finally works, that same idea, which was a note-taking app for language learners became real.

Study brew website

A lot of the structure I could recycle from my other flagship SaaS, because I know it works: split view, notes, live sync. Building isn't the problem anymore, I think. My biggest concern was positioning, branding, and go-to-market strategy, because I'd decided to rebrand Story Brew to Study Brew.

Context

Story Brew was the starting point. I was simply recording bedtime stories for English learners, and I quietly gave up on the idea of building an app around it. I never gave up on the recording itself, because I'm still pivoting toward a career as a content creator, and this was part of that journey.

Then I thought about it more, and at the end of June I decided to rebrand it to Study Brew.

Here's the problem. I got a notification during the weekend from Spotify telling me I'd hit 500 downloads on Study Brew.

Study brew creators for spotify

There are 17 subscribers on Spotify, and a handful on YouTube, not counting Apple Podcasts or Amazon.

Story brew stats 3

I thought, fuck, I'm about to screw myself over. I was turning a pivot into a mess that would need extra effort just to help people understand the brand I'm building.

Story brew stats 1

But then I knew what to do.

Positioning, not panic

Even though the YouTube channel and Spotify broadcast are small, I decided to stay on brand and let Story Brew live on its own. Keeping it more niche makes sense, positioned as part of Study Brew rather than replaced by it.

Story brew on YouTube

Story Brew's DNA stays the same: I record bedtime stories, and nothing else. The Study Brew podcast will cover a broader range of stories and topics.

What I noticed is that a good number of listeners, if you can call it many, are there specifically for my voice before bedtime. I got comments and compliments about that more than once. When I remembered that, it was obvious: don't fix what isn't broken.

So I'm building two separate podcasts serving the same audience, but with different jobs. One stays niche and protects what already works. The other carries the Study Brew name and funnels people toward the note-taking app.

Realizing that, I understood how close I came to blowing it. I almost fucking torched the most valuable part of my entire distribution and acquisition strategy in terms of organic growth, and for nothing.

Why standing my ground made this easier, not harder

In most cases, you can get away with a pivot. Rename the goddamn thing, redirect the audience, move on. But my recordings aren't AI-generated, and that matters more than I gave it credit for at first.

Story Brew is still a strong enough name on its own that I couldn't let it die just because I'd decided to build something bigger around it.

Standing my ground here wasn't about being stubborn for the sake of it. It was about recognizing that Story Brew already earned something a new brand can't fake:

People who show up specifically for it, night after night, for something as ordinary as a bedtime story. That kind of loyalty takes time to build and almost no time to destroy. I wasn't going to trade it for a cleaner org chart.

The part I had backwards at first was assuming two podcasts meant double the work. It doesn't. It's easier.

When Story Brew tried to be everything, bedtime stories and broader language content, while also carrying a rebrand, the lines blurred. Now each show has one job.

Story Brew stays exactly what it was, a nightly bedtime story, nothing more. Study Brew becomes the umbrella, the wider variety, and the path toward the app. Splitting them apart removed the ambiguity instead of adding to it.

This is why single focus matters so much. These small decisions, the ones that look minor in the moment, can quietly change the direction of a startup.

It's also the main reason I keep writing mental notes like this one on my blog. Writing it out is what gets me to clarity, not the other way around.

This week is mostly about planning, recording, and writing, so it was the right moment to map out a clearer plan for both podcasts: one tied to bedtime stories, the other aimed at a wider audience.

I almost blew it by trying to fix something that wasn't broken. Instead, I'm keeping Story Brew exactly as it is, and building Study Brew around it, not over it.

Pieter Borremans

Written by

Pieter Borremans

Writer·Content creator·Founder

Based in Taichung, Taiwan and London, UK, this is Pieter's personal journal and builder's blog: field notes on entrepreneurship, solo business-building, and the unfiltered reality of creating online. Alongside it, he's chasing one absurd goal in public, $168M USD in lifetime earnings, tracked live from zero.